... Are Met in You Today.
Notion: "stilling the soothing internal voice that tells us everything will be okay" to "embrace hopelessness"
Compare with: "stilling the panicky internal voice that tells us everything is going wrong" to "embrace fearlessness".
Are these silly notions, and if they are not, could they stand improvement?
The internal voices of each individual vary not only with time, but in the frequency of occurrence. Some might have panicky voices all the time, and never the soothing voice, for example. I do not believe that many people have any awareness of their internal voices, and I propose that this is more so in our modern communication age than ever in history. Our population today is constantly surrounded by the voices from Pop songs, Radio, Television and Movies, never mind the endless buzz of the mobile phones, internet and urban crowds.
Where does an individual today get encouraged to listen to their internal voices? It used to be easier, and it used to be encouraged through religious guidance, but we all know how much of a setback religion took in Christian countries in the Sixties.
Embracing hopelessness and fearlessness? I don't think I quite agree with the choice of the word "embrace". It is not possible to embrace abstractions, let alone emotionless abstractions, except in an abstract sense. The word "embrace" invokes enquiry, but is not the most useful description of the action.
Adoption? Welcoming? Inviting?
These words point out that there is a staged process in the adoption of hopelessness and fearlessness:
3. Welcoming, embracing;
In other words, imagine Hopelessness and Fearlessness were travellers whom wandered into your neigbourhood. You would have to go through these stages of communicating with them before they became active members of your rational toolbox.
Alternatively, let us consider hopelessness and fearlessness to be nothing more than points on a line that runs from Hope to Fear. (Hope and Fear are essential tools in all living things upon which their survival and success depend). To move easily back and forth along the spectrum requires that you should be able to adopt any point on that line quickly and responsively, with rational control.
This means that you must be able to "bid goodbye" to hopelessness and fearlessness just as easily as you must embrace it.
The problem then is how to manage a world of Procrastinators (those who live in Hope and Fear without making effective actions) and Activists (those who seek change because they live in hopelessness and fearlessness).
I think that's the lot. I think I will award myself Today's Doctorate for that.